|
|
The end of an era and The Royal Navy prior to the Second World War Britain gained tremendously, in a territorial sense, from World War One. The Versailles Treaty had carved up the Ottoman Empire and stripped away Germany's overseas colonies. Consequently, the British Empire, one of the great Imperial benefactors from Versailles, was both relatively and physically larger than ever. Nonetheless, Britain's expanded colonial holdings also created an enormous burden for a British military tasked with defending Britain's Empire against those nations identified as a menace to British supremacy. In particular, Germany, Italy and Japan all represented significant threats to British interests. Therefore, British military and economic planning amply considered the risk these powers posed to the British dominated status quo in the world. The British approached foreign threats to the Empire in two ways. First, Britain maintained only a small army and poured resources into building a potent air force and overwhelming navy. Second, Britain strategically positioned her military assets. For countering German power Britain maintained small ground forces and strategically positioning air and naval units near the European continent. The British would rely on their French partners and France's large army to carry the burden of facing down a German threat on the continent. As for dealing with the challenges posed by the Italians and Japanese, the British planned for the Royal Navy to carry the defensive load. The Royal Navy needed to protect important shipping lanes around the globe; especially in the Mediterranean Sea and Eastern Oceans. In the Far East, Britain imported oil and rubber from Indonesia and Singapore through the critical Straights of Malacca. Nonetheless, in spite of the formidable challenges presented by the Empire's vast scope, Britain tackled these problems by repositioning military assets, and building massive fortresses in Gibraltar and Singapore, astride the most important trade routes. In addition, British shipyard output remained as prodigious as ever. The 1930s era Royal Navy was simply huge and could call upon 15 battleships, 6 aircraft carriers, 54 cruisers, 145 destroyers, and 54 submarines for combat operations.[7] For nearly any other country the sheer size and expense of maintaining a Navy such as this was unfathomable; however for the British it was expected. Since the decisive British victory in the Seven Years' War in Europe ,[8] British naval power had ruled the world's oceans and created the foundation for Britain's 19th-century Empire in India, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, and North America. This empire arose in no small part from the British victories during the mid 18th century. The British Navy then dominated the 19th century with powerful ships mounting numerous cannons; ships also possessing the ability to sail great distances. During the late 19th Century and early part of the 20th Century this tradition continued in the great battle fleets of dreadnoughts forming the British Navy's nucleus.[9] For over three centuries, naval power protected the British Empire. Therefore, in the 1930s as Britain set about desperately attempting to hold together her fragile and far-flung empire, she reverted to the naval tradition that built her empire. Great Britain, economically reliant as she was on her overseas Empire, maintained a navy exceeding the combined power of Europe's other navies. Just as in other navies, the battle fleet formed the Royal Navy's backbone. Nevertheless, battleships were enormously expensive weapons systems, requiring large, well-trained crews and massive amounts of fuel for the ships' powerful engines. In addition, these ships took years to build and only exceedingly wealthy nations with long running naval programs possessed the ability to field anywhere near the numbers of these ships required to challenge for control of the seas. The massive investment in men and resources incurred in building and maintaining a battle fleet meant these ships' costs inhibited their use. Losing a single ship could prove devastating.[10] The inflexibility associated with the battle fleet thus ran counter to a basic tenant of weaponry; useful weapons are expendable weapons. Battleships were not expendable. Their very size and strength represented their weakness. Moreover, tests done in the interwar period convinced some 20th century naval planners that if the battleship was not dead as a useful weapon, it at least needed the protection offered by aircraft carriers to operate effectively. In addition to the threat to surface ships represented by aircraft a second threat to battle fleets emerged from the First World War - the submarine. Prior to World War One the submarine had lacked the technological ability to come to fruition as a capable weapons system. Problems regarding propulsion, navigation, and combat capabilities proved endemic in 19th century submarines. Late in the 19th century however, American John Holland solved most of these problems when he realized he could supplement the engine submarines used for propulsion on the surface with an additional engine for underwater use. Thus, Holland combined a gasoline-powered engine, later diesel, for surface propulsion and an electric motor for underwater use charged by the surface engine.[11] This model went through little alteration over the next half-century and the submarine as an effective underwater weapon was born, seeing its first effective use during World War One; in the hands of a German navy seeking to vitiate British naval supremacy. Only technological limitations, and American intervention in the war, kept the submarine or U-boat (for the German Unterseeboat) from starving Great Britain from the First World War.[12] The submarine represented a potentially war altering weapon if employed to destroy the economy of an enemy heavily reliant upon seaborne trade. Accordingly, in the 1930s, as Germany again attempted to challenge the global status quo, German naval planners once again turned to the submarine as an integral part of the new navy Hitler had ordered built. 1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 Next Page |
The Globe At War |
Revisiting the Second World War's Battle for the Atlantic: A Case Study in Asymmetric Naval Warfare Providing Powerful Lessons for today's Navy |